Parents lose appeal to keep critically ill baby Indi on life support
INDI Gregory’s parents have lost their appeal to keep the 7-month-old girl – who suffers from the same disease as Charlie Gard – on life support. A High Court judge ruled that doc… A High Court judge has dismissed an appeal by Indi Gregory's parents to keep the 7-month-old girl, who suffers from the same disease as Charlie Gard, on life support. This decision was made by Mr Justice Peel, who ruled that doctors could legally limit the treatment they provide to Indi, despite the wishes of her parents, Dean Gregory and Claire Staniforth, who are both in their 30s and from Ilkeston, Derbyshire, who argued that the depth of the inquiry into Indi's case was inadequate and the High Court trial was "procedurally unfair". However, two Court of Appeal judges dismissed their challenge, stating that there was no real prospect of winning an appeal. Indi was born on February 24 2023 and suffers from mitochondrial disease, a genetic condition that saps energy.
Diterbitkan : 2 tahun lalu oleh Harry Goodwin di dalam Health
INDI'S FIGHT Indi Gregory’s parents lose appeal to keep 7-month-old who suffers from same disease as Charlie Gard on life support
INDI Gregory's parents have lost their appeal to keep the 7-month-old girl - who suffers from the same disease as Charlie Gard - on life support.
A High Court judge ruled that doctors could lawfully limit the treatment they provide to Indi Gregory - against the wishes of her parents, Dean Gregory and Claire Staniforth.
Indi's parents, who are both in their 30s and from Ilkeston, Derbyshire, had challenged Mr Justice Peel's ruling.
But two Court of Appeal judges have dismissed their challenge
Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Birss had considered arguments at a Court of Appeal hearing in London on Monday.
They concluded that Indi's parents did not have an arguable case - and no "real prospect" of winning an appeal.
Indi's parents argued that the "depth of the inquiry" carried out by Mr Justice Peel had been "inadequate".
They also argued that the High Court trial had been "procedurally unfair" and complained that Mr Justice Peel had refused to give them an "effective opportunity" to obtain expert medical evidence of their own.
Mr Justice Peel had heard evidence about Indi's condition at a private trial in the Family Division of the High Court, in London.
He heard that Indi, who was born on February 24 2023, had mitochondrial disease, a genetic condition that saps energy, and is being treated at the Queen's Medical Centre in Nottingham.
Specialists say she is dying and bosses at the hospital's governing trust asked Mr Justice Peel to rule that doctors could lawfully limit treatment provided to her.
Barrister Emma Sutton KC, who led Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust's legal team, told Mr Justice Peel that Indi was critically ill and had an exceptionally rare and devastating neurometabolic disorder.
She said the treatment Indi received caused pain and was futile.
Ms Sutton had argued that Indi's parents' appeal should be dismissed.
Mr Justice Peel had considered evidence behind closed doors, but he allowed journalists to attend the hearing and ruled that Indi, her parents and the hospital could be named in reports.
He ruled that medics treating Indi and a guardian appointed to represent her interests could not be named.
Appeal judges oversaw the appeal hearing in public but ruled that medics and the guardian could not be named in reports.
Indi's parents are being supported by campaign group the Christian Legal Centre.